I've said for a number of years
that most of the bad things that happen in Fayetteville are real
estate driven. From the city's controversial decision to violate its
own tree ordinance to the closing of the old Jefferson School to an
ordinance that only allows three unrelated people to live together in
one residence (making it a lot harder for low wage earners as well as
the town's student population to get by) to a coloring book
distributed by the city's Code Enforcement department that
illustrates housing code violations with offensively stereotyped
working class characters to attacks on my own public access TV show
as a deterrent to “Young Executives” who might be interested in
buying property there, I've seen example after example in my 20 years
of living here.
Fayetteville's identity crisis
with class and real estate could best be summed up with one incident:
During the 2004 Mayoral debate, then-Mayor Dan Coody (who handily
coasted to re-election that year) was asked what he would do for the
perennially low-income south end of the town (where I, incidentally,
lived at the time). He answered that it wasn't a case of
“going-to-do”....” we're doing it,” he said, but it was a
long-term project that wouldn't come to fruition overnight. He cited
the development of the TIF (Tax Incremental Funding) district at the
time--this was meant to finance the building of some hifallutin'
tower/luxury hotel construct that fell through (I think it's now an
ugly parking lot) and boasted of all the good it was doing.
Specifically mentioned was the fact that they had gotten rid of some
unsightly mobile homes and were going to build some apartments in
their place that were going to be “beautiful”.
I watched the debate on TV. I
wished I could have been there in person, because the question I
would have liked to have lobbed in response would have been, “what
happened to the people who lived in those trailers? Were they not
also members of the 'Community'?”
To my knowledge, no one, other
than me, ever bothered to ask that question. This guy, it should be
noted, was the “Green-leaning, Liberal Good Guy”
candidate....which probably defines my ongoing struggle with
Fayetteville's liberal/activist community---most of them are moneyed,
tenured types, and at their core, classist as hell. The
Beautification Crowd are suave, educated and sophisticated, and the
idea of what happens to human beings really never occurs to them.
The latest manifestation of this
phenomenon recently reared its deceptively pretty head when plans
were announced for a new suburb called “Willow Bend”. To quote
their intentions from their own website, right up front, “the
Walker Park neighborhood, located just south of downtown
Fayetteville, lacks quality affordable housing “, and this
development proposes, on some level, to remedy that issue.
If you're talking quality, they
may have something. With the South End, you're talking lots of
blighted neighborhoods and shacks....you're also talking a
neighborhood Fayetteville seemed to turn a blind eye to when they
shut down Jefferson School a decade ago. That, to many people,
pointed up the elitism at the heart of Fayetteville City
Government—-dismantling a civic focal point in a poor neighborhood
as part of a gerrymandering stunt. Poor people----minorities----you
know, they don't look good in Campaign Spots.
On the other hand, if you're
talking Affordability, where does it balance out? I worry when the
pencil pushers talk about Affordable Housing, because their version
of Affordable isn't the same as my version of Affordable. I don't
look good in Campaign Commercials, either....
So, when I heard about Willow
Bend, my initial thoughts were, okay, which poor bastards are losing
their homes because of this? And how many of them won't be able to
afford to share in the New FutureTM? (And in case you were wondering,
my educated guess was, “not many”....)
As it turns out, I believe the
future site of Willow Bend is going to be the wooded area behind
Walker Park.
Walker Park has a reputation in
Fayetteville---not the nicest park in town. It's a big homeless
hangout. I remember in the late 90s Food Not Bombs had a lot of big
feeds out there (before the first wave of gentrification saw a lot of
the Autonomist/Radical element in town vacuumed up). The Salvation
Army is nearby and I know that there was a Hobo Jungle out in back of
the place----there may be camps in the woods that would be the future
home of Willow Bend, also----it would make sense. And it would give
our town fathers an impetus to bulldoze that space for
something.....well, PRETTIER. Something where real estate could be
moved.
And who could object to a nice
neighborhood? I couldn't---could you?
You don't have to scratch the
surface of Fayetteville's squeaky clean liberal community much to get
to the classists underneath. One person I knew commented on the
supermarket in the Walker Park area and its shabby clientele by
saying “I'm afraid of getting raped there!” (because, as we all
know, there's an epidemic of rapes happening in Supermarkets.) She
talked about the disgusting caliber of people who shopped
there---which my wife and I were privately horrified by---I worked in
that area at the time and it wasn't unusual for the two of us to to
stop by that store at the end of my shift to grab a cheap breakfast
....so we most likely could have been part of that disgusting caliber
of people she felt so threatened by.
Yeah, well....if there's anything
I've learned, that's Fayetteville for ya.
There have been problems of late
in Fayetteville's transient community; there were two stabbings in
2015----(one occurred in a homeless camp around U of A, one in Walker
Park, sparking a new wave of contrived anti-homeless hysteria). So
what better time to clean the place up? Can't have all those nasty
po' folks runnin' around, bringing down the property values!
Here in Fayettenam, of course,
we've put a lot of hype behind how we're a “Compassionate”
Community. Yeah. I know all about that. I remember the “Compassion”
the city showed when one particular non-profit contractor's board of
directors decided it was okay to ransack its employees' personnel
files, even though that was a basic FOIA no-no. I remember how
activists who tried to blow the whistle on this monkey business were
vilified by local journalists and city-related bloggers. I remember
this because I was one of those activists. But hey----don't ever get
in the way of a good PR stunt, right? “City of Compassion”---that's
catchy. And I'm sure it'll sell lots of high-dollar property to
well-meaning Young ExecutivesTM.
And like the idea of a good
neighborhood, who could argue with it?
As a “City of Compassion”TM,
we don't Guiliani the hell out of our transient population, because
that would be cruel. We will, however, price them out of existence
with the building of lots of pretty things, and we'll bring in lots
of pretty people to buy the pretty things. You know....people who
bring the property values up. Pretty people. People who look good in
PR spots. People who look good in campaign commercials. And then, I'm
sure we can get rid of a lot of the other run-down housing in the
area. The people who actually LIVE there? Well, they have all the
wrong aesthetics and they probably don't even recycle. They can find
someplace else to live.
“There used to be this
unsightly park full of all these panhandlers and poor people and
rednecks and minorities...now, it's really pretty, though, and we're
bringing people into the neighborhood who consider that an investment
worth supporting. And this whole end of town is looking so much
better now!”
Well, who can't get behind that? Soon we'll all be able to shop in peace.
########
It's been a few weeks since David
Bowie shuffled off this mortal coil and I'm still surprised as to
how wretched I was over that particular death. Perhaps it's that his
demise came a couple of days after the release of a genuine
masterpiece....most recording artists are resting on their laurels by
age 40. Bowie's career had its peaks and valleys, but BLACKSTAR at
age 69? Unprecedented.
I spent a good chunk of those
weeks listening to good music and combing over the most recent videos
for “Lazarus” and “Blackstar”, the latter of which I found
spellbinding. What the hell was going on in that video, that song,
and what the hell was Bowie trying to tell us????
Naturally, because everyone's
supposed to be part of the IlluminatiTM, all the usual drivel about
the Devil started popping up online, complete with the usual
contrived psychobabble about “Pentagrams” (sorry, hacks....a book
with a star on it is not a “Pentagram”), the usual Albert Pike
misquotes and so on and so forth, and sadly when you look up anything
occult-leaning or esoteric on the net, that will be the majority of
what you find.
I was hoping to read some
well-read or well-informed interpretations and eventually I found some
thought-provoking stuff: kylebstiff throws around some interesting
jazz about ancient astronaut theory and the Gnostic concept of
Yahweh/Yaldabaoth as blind/insane god, archons feeding on the
religious ecstasies of acolytes, etc.
And vigilant citizen built a
pretty thoughtful overview of Bowie's career as an exercise in
acension/descent and apotheosis.
I don't think there are
necessarily any straightforward answers because Bowie was never a
particularly straightforward guy. He probably upped the potential of
the Concept Album by refusing to deal with linear storylines (find a
concrete plot in ZIGGY STARDUST or OUTSIDE if you can) and I've
always had a thing for mosaic-style narratives.
Being a writer and an artist (as
opposed to a theologian or a soothsayer) I'm more comfortable with
the grey area and the possibilities as opposed to black-and-white
meanings. What really enthralled me in the run up to the release of
BLACKSTAR was what conceptually, to me, almost felt like an aesthetic
line poem of the man's entire body of work....of course, you get the
“Major Tom” theme, which has cropped up from “Space Oddity”
to “Scary Monsters” and here the man (or his remains, anyway) has
literally fallen to earth (or someplace) to be venerated by this
tribe of people who form a religion around it.... as stand-alones,
there's some strange commonality between the promotional videos for
“Ashes to Ashes” and “Fashion” (both incorporate this very
cryptic, almost religious-feeling “bowing” gesture but in very
different contexts) but cross-compare “Fashion” with that strange
“bunny-hop” move the dancers are making and look at what the
“acolyte” characters are doing in “Blackstar”....it's MORE OR
LESS THE SAME MOVE. Coincidence?
Perhaps a play on culture,
customs and orthodoxies? The orthodoxy of fashion and the orthodoxy
of religion?
Not necessarily pinned on a
linear meaning, here, but an interesting pull back when you realize
the threads you may be able to connect in a much larger body of work.
RIP, Spaceman.
THIS WEEK'S PLAYLIST (All Bowie all the
time):
- Blackstar (Blackstar)
- Sue (or in a Season of Crime) (Blackstar)
- Panic in Detroit (Aladdin Sane)
- Five Years (Ziggy Stardust)
- Heart's Filthy Lesson (Outside)
- Fashion (Scary Monsters)
- Look Back in Anger (Lodger)
- Rosalyn (Pin Ups)
- Future Legend/Diamond Dogs (Diamond Dogs)
- Speed of Life (Low)
- Sense of Doubt (Heroes)
- Neukoln (Heroes)
- Station to Station (Station to Station)
- Beauty and the Beast (Heroes)
- Memory of a Free Festival (Space Oddity)
Hey, friend. Nice blog. I've been following this Willow Bend "backfill project" with some interest since I live just NE of the proposed sight, probably a few thousand feet as the crow flies. The infill project is kind of across the street from Walker Park/Senior Center area on S. College, in the undeveloped wooded area between that and Wood Avenue (the dead end road that leads to Nantucket Apartments).
ReplyDeleteI went to a city council meeting and they said that the thought that the smallest bungalow in the project was going to be in the 70K range, all brand new. I didn't get much detail, but I'm assuming that they will be cookie cutter and made without the most expensive appliances and finishes, etc., that drive up the cost of houses. I was told that people would have to qualify for them being low income or first time homeowners, etc. They will not be investors or flippers.
There are going to be multiple price points, so I assume there will be one-bedroom, 2 bedroom, 3 bedroom, etc. Maybe with garage, maybe without. Probably smallish properties, but access to walking trails, etc. Sense of neighborhood (front porches) and community.
It does sound good on paper. I hope that it ends up being as good as it sounds. The existing low-end priced properties are being snapped up by developers to scrape and erect expensive multi-story homes, or by flippers to make a quick buck, or by landlords looking for their next slumlord rentals where they charge cheap rent and never fix anything.
Many property owners are holding on their shanties in the hopes that the developer will want their location and buy their piece of crap for big money. I can't say that I blame them fully. I mean, why sell it for $40K when you can get $80K or even $100K? But, it does make it hard for anyone to buy an affordable piece of property to legitimately live in. I was SO lucky to get my 2 BR house for $83K, multiple layers of hideous old lady wallpaper notwithstanding.
I think that my husband and I will continue to fix up our home and then we'll decide whether we want to live in it or sell and move elsewhere. I think that our home will sell for decent money because of its 1962 bones, hardwood floors, etc. We will update the things that desperately need it and remove of cover up the stuff of questionable taste (carpet, etc.). I think our home will be charming enough that it will hold its value in the wake of Willow Bend. But, I am sad that it has become much much harder to find a reasonably priced starter home. You would have to snap it up the DAY it came out in the MLS and hope that you were the first bid and high enough to be accepted. It's gotten that competitive just in the past year.
Anyway, just thought I'd fill you in on what little I know of the Willow Bend thing. Ciao.
Oh, please excuse the typos!! Paragraph #2 They not the. Paragraph #6 or not of.
ReplyDelete