Earlier this week I had done with the day’s duties and I was
staggering off to bed. My wife had beaten me there by roughly an hour.
As I entered the bedroom, I noticed that the night’s choice of
sleepytime white noise on the tube was our copy of “Kiss in Attack of
the Phantoms” and at the point of my arrival it was running at about the
45 minute mark. As I readied for bed, my wife sat bolt upright with the
remote and flipped the DVD back to the opening credits, mumbling
something vague about, “so you can watch the whole thing.” Then she
promptly laid back down and continued sleeping.
Wow, thanks,
I thought----and due to some mad insomnia, I think I did wind up awake
through most of the questionable spectacle. Later the next day, she
informed me that she had been half-dreaming that the DVD was supposed to
be a “special cut” of the film and somewhere in her head it was
supposed to be radically different from the original---so I guess it was
supposed to be a glam rock “Battleship Potemkin” or something.
This terrible, terrible movie is late night video comfort food in our
home, sandwiched somewhere between Something Weird trailer comps, box
sets of “Kids in the Hall” and “Mr. Show” and Frankie & Annette
Beach epics. This is the stuff we use to lull ourselves off to sleep and
it usually runs all night long.
“Attack of the Phantoms”
is the theatrical release of the 1978 made-for-TV movie, “Kiss meets the
Phantom of the Park”---Gordon Hessler, who gave us several Vincent
Price films as well as “Murders in the Rue Morgue” (Herbert Lom
version), “The Golden Voyage of Sinbad” and “The Girl on the Swing”,
grinned and bore directorial duties.
“Kiss meets the Phantom”
is a bad movie. It’s important to note this. As fringe film geeks, we
often find ourselves in the existential and thankless position of
defending films others write off as “bad movies”,,,frequently there’s a
“but” involved, because people weaned on the mainstream need a “But”
preface to be pulled into our perspective…”sure, It has no budget to
speak of….but they did a lot with what little they were given.” “Sure,
it seems hackneyed, but you need to remember that they had two weeks to
film the thing and then the set was used for this OTHER movie.” “The
acting sucks, but the writing is great.” “The story might be derivative,
but look at the cinematography!” “It may be awkward and haphazard, but
you have to look at these historical perspectives.” “But….but….LOOK AT
THAT BADASS LIGHTING!!!!” If you’re waiting for the “But” with “KMTP”,
don’t hold your breath. It’s a bad movie.
However…and while
there might not be a big cult film “But”, here, there are a few
special, pleading “Howevers”---there are a couple of film conventions
going on that are worth noting: First and foremost, of course, there are
the obvious tips of the hat to “The Phantom of the Opera”----in this
case the titular “Phantom” is the Wiz behind all the rides and
attractions, who, feeling spurned under economic pressures, goes on a
sabotagin’ rampage with his robot creations. Secondarily (and in my
eyes, most interesting), there is a common thread at work, here, with a
lot of the Mexican Wrestling pictures from back in the day, in which
Santo, Blue Demon and other masked wrestling luminaries battled monsters
and alien invaders. Not that I think Hessler, Hanna-Barbera or
(ESPECIALLY) Kiss and Aucoin, Inc. had any inkling of such delirious
schlock---and KMTP is far too canned for such exotic Dada---but the
thread is too strong to ignore. Lives hang in the balance and the future
of the world is in jeopardy and so the President calls on…a Wrestler?! A
madman threatens the lives of thousands and so who else could save the
day but the hardest-rocking heroes of Puppetland? The narrative thread,
even if unconscious, is staggering.
But these tenuous
threads notwithstanding, I’m not gonna blow sunshine up your ass; this
is one titanic turkey of a film. Take no other assessments.
Inna nutshell, the Amusement Park the flick takes place in (And
yes---the entirety of the film’s action takes place IN A GODDAMN
AMUSEMENT PARK) is facing tough financial times---in hopes of boosting
attendance, park owner Calvin Richards (70s stalwart Carmine Caridi)
books the 70s’ favorite cartoon rock band, Kiss, to do a three-night
stint. This invokes the ire of his old compadre, Abner Devereaux
(world-class character actor Anthony Zerbe, whose exemplary
scenery-chewing is the only reason I can scare up to watch this
turd---Zerbe scores an A-list ham-job in material that is demoralizing
at best. It’s obvious that he knows the caliber of the piece he’s been
saddled with and he plays it like a harp from Hell ). See, Devereaux is
the brains behind all the rides and gadgetry in the park---he’s
especially defensive of the motheaten anthropomorphic figures that
delight the kiddies by lurching around in a 3-foot radius over and over
all the live-long day. It seems a particular affront to him that all his
research and development bucks are being siphoned off to promote this
decadent and tacky rock band, just when he’s on the verge of a major
breakthrough---alas for Abner, the bottom line is The Bottom Line.
Behind the scenes, though, foul play is afoot---park patrons and
employees are mysteriously going MIA. Devereaux keeps ranting that he is
on the verge of a major breakthrough, but his raging, aggro narcissism
finally forces Calvin to pull the plug and fire his old friend.
Devereaux descends into his underground lab, vowing to destroy the park.
Roughly an hour into the travesty, Kiss (Stanley, Simmons, Frehley
& Criss) enter the film, lip-sync songs like “Shout it Out Loud”,
“Rock and Roll All Nite”, “I Stole your Love” and “Beth” amid a mishmash
of concert footage---they wooden soldier through gawdawful dialogue and
an idiot plot and fun and laffs ensue.
Devereaux’s
“breakthrough” is that his silly, anthropomorphic robots have become
very lifelike and very dangerous---oh---yeah---and they’re essentially
cybernetically enhanced slaves—all those folks disappearing?
YEAH---Devereaux has taken them and turned them into an army of mindless
“Small World” androids.
Enter Sam and Melissa (Terry Lester
and Deborah Ryan), a bland, beige-dressed couple who are the Allan Jones
and Kitty Carlisle to Kiss’s Marx Brothers here. Sam is a new Devereaux
lackey who blunders into an elevator and disappears only to be
reconfigured as Abner’s favorite electro-zombie. My guess is that he
caught Devereaux dressed as Holly Hobby, whacking off over his own
genius, and paid the ultimate price---sometimes you see too much.
Melissa is a walking plot device---she spends the rest of the film
palling around with Kiss, wringing her hands over Sam’s whereabouts and
screaming breathlessly when the situation calls for it.
Devereaux has sabotaged the whole party by creating a bad robot
Kiss---most notably a bad robot Gene Simmons, who runs amok (sometimes
accompanied by android redcoats) breaking stuff and terrorizing
rentacops (most notably dependable character actor Brion James,
squandered here). Kiss, in addition to being the world’s greatest
cartoon rock band, are beings gifted with superhuman powers. They stalk
Devereaux around the park, battling android ninjas, a fat Frankenstein
robot, cybernetic albino space monkeys and finally, onstage in front of
God’n’everybody, their evil robot doubles---a scenario later copped for
“Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey” in the early 90s…not everybody caught the
reference in that movie----but I did.
The oddball
denouement has Sam being freed of his robot control while Devereaux is
revealed, whitehaired and comatose (or dead)---segue to the ending
shot---an earlier image of Devereaux wandering around the roller coaster
with a facial expression that seems to blend introspection, Luciferian
malice and a bad case of constipation---you check it out if you think
I’m joking---I’ve made this face numerous times for Heather and SHE
can’t argue---while the melancholy “Mr. Make Believe” from Simmons’ 1978
solo album plays….this might be to say the angry spirit of Abner
Devereaux will always lurk in the park---or it might just be ham fisted
editing on someone’s part---you can bandy theories about all you want,
bucco---my money’s on the latter supposition, all the way.
“KMTP” went from TV to a brief run around the driveins, then it
unceremoniously disappeared into home video obscurity---and yet it
refuses to die. A big part of the blame, of course, is the shameless
institution of Kiss, Inc., who are all too glad to milk an abortion for a
meal ticket---it’s also perpetuated by the Kiss Kult in general—and
they’re a very scary, non-discriminating bunch---like rock’n’roll
trekkies you dare not turn your back on.
I can’t say a lot,
though, since I own the horrific thing. In some inexplicable, sodden
way, “KMTP” takes hold, like a deadly fungus, and it has a perverse kind
of resonance.
My cousin recently threw me a “what if”
scenario---what if this film had really taken off---not from a Kiss
perspective, but from a “Phantom of the Park” perspective? What if a
whole franchise of these monstrosities had been produced? “The Captain
and Tenille meet the Phantom of the Park”…”The Dukes of Hazzard meet the
Phantom of the Park”…”Wonder Woman meets the Phantom of the Park”….”The
Bee Gees meet the Phantom of the Park”. Personally, I would have liked
to have seen how Slade woulda handled the situation.
Twisted, the way this crap worms its way into the brain, eh? Hang
tight---I have an even more maleficent brainstorm---“Kiss meets the
Phantom of the Park: The Rock Opera”. The real action surrounds Abner
Devereaux and his inner conflict---Kiss themselves are just kind of a
deus ex machina that come in at the end and sort everything out---you
could even fold in the choruses to “Shout it out Loud” and “Rock and
Roll All Nite” as kind of an ironic, apocryphal Greek Chorus device.
I’ve given this a great deal of thought and I think it REALLY COULD
WORK. There’s the part of the movie where Calvin takes Abner for a ride
on the park monorail to explain the dollars-and-cents reality of his
position---all the other happy passengers are unaware that a lifelong
friendship is quietly going down the tubes in the back car. Now put this
all to a “Tommy”-esque, bloated, baroque rock score and entitle it,
“The two Saddest Guys on the Monorail”---TELL ME THAT’S NOT A GRADE-A
IDEA. TELL ME THAT WOULD NEVER WORK. KNOCK THIS BATTERY OFF MY SHOULDER,
I DARE YA. Think about the stampede of rockers who would kill to play
Abner Devereaux in a rock opera! What’s Marilyn Manson doing these days?
You know he’d eat this up….this is what the younguns refer to as
“Post-Modernism”.
And after a while, I just get so tired….so tired. It doesn’t show, does it? Do I look like I’m tired?
“We found him by the side of the road, Chief, just rambling
incoherently about Lil’ Abner and Marilyn Manson and sad guys on
monorails---then he started screaming about being a misunderstood genius
and we just had to haul him in for the general peace…you know, there’s a
very nasty strain of Phantom floating around, lately, and this poor
bastard’s obviously tripping balls…not a lot we can do for him except
let him sleep it off…you feel that jitter, buster? Those are the
strychnine jitters…you know, that Phantom stuff…you do know they cut it
with rat poison, right? Or DID you know? Just relax for a while,
pal---we’ll let you post bail when you’re calm enough to spell
‘Mississippi’…”
After awhile I have to back off and drag my
peepers from the abyss and acknowledge that that way lies madness. But
what is it that perpetually drags me to that infernal bottomless well?
Why does goddamn Abner Devereaux ride herd over my shattered psyche, and
how can I heal myself, or at least score a sizeable profit off the
trauma?
Who is this forsaken freak, Abner Devereaux, and how
did he come into the possession of every joker in the maniac’s tarot?
What was his background? What are his hopes, his dreams, his favorite TV
shows? Is he a “Lou Grant” guy, or a “Love Boat” guy? Does he read
NEWSWEEK? Where does he come from, and what does he want from me? What
are his turn-ons and turn-offs? And what’s with Fat Frankenstein,
anyway?
I have this idea that he doesn’t correspond to
normal, according-to-Hoyle sexuality. Certainly, he may have vague
designs on Beige Oatmeal Girl, but I think it’s less a case of wanting
to have his way with her and more a case of needing that certain special
someone who will squeal with delight at all your impressive
inventions…yes, kids, some deeply misshapen part of me understands the
mad scientist’s wounded ego.
Perhaps it’s that, in each and
every one of us, the universal truth we’d all like to sweep under the
rug is that we are ALL Abner Devereaux---that this tragic,
misunderstood, mad genius lurks in us all, jilted by the bottom line and
unable to make his breakthrough and waiting in rapt anger to bring the
hammer down on all who’ve thwarted his dreams.
That’s some
nice damn fortune cookie rationale, but in the end even my feverish,
gibbering mind can’t support it…the truth is that Devereaux doesn’t come
righteously by his actions because the kindling that fires his dreams
is PEOPLE. Poor ole Sam, milquetoast though he might be, doesn’t deserve
a life of mindless slavery---and the juvenile delinquents who vandalize
the park, only to become android minutemen in some historical
“redemption” dreamt up in Abner’s twisted mind? They might have had
their indiscretions, but the problem with the doctrine of Hell---even
Devereaux’s tinpot purgatory, is that after aeons of suffering and/or
robot servitude, even the Hitlers, Stalins and Mansons of the world
have to come up square with the house at one point or another.
A world where Abner Devereaux emerges victorious is a world that’s not
about to do anyone a damned bit of good---let’s just be honest, I
wouldn’t be happy in that scenario, and neither would you. Do you want
to spend the rest of your life applauding some clown in a lab coat every
time he comes up with the hot new robot? He might land those crucial
research and development dollars, but whether it’s a clunky mechanical
gorilla who lurches back and forth on a chain, a historical figure
cobbled from a young ne’er-do-well, evil robot Gene Simmons or a
lifelike android Barbershop Quartet harmonizing over their missing body
parts, it’s a pretty bleak future. Choose your own adventure, chief—do
you want to listen to the spare parts quartet warble about how “it must
be the look in her eyes” while Uncle Ab stands off to the side nursing a
raging stiffy, or do you want to go spend three nights watching the
greatest cartoon band in the world blow shit up real good?
Me? I’ll take three nights with the cartoon rockers any day. Sorry…it was an easy choice.
One of the saddest memories of my youth is being at the amusement park
in Hampton, New Hampshire, watching my younger brother, who may have
been 11 or 12 at the time, ride the bumper cars. He was constantly
getting wedged up in a knot of cars---I witnessed a sad look of despair
and consternation on his face as he haplessly worked the wheel and some
rangy carny with a microphone harangued him. “Just back out of the
corner, willya, Ace?!” My brother didn’t want to be on that goddamned
ride…I don’t know whose bent, misbegotten idea of fun that was.
In a world designed to amuse the likes of Abner Devereaux, we’re all
stuck in that lousy bumper car gridlock, fighting the wheel for no good
reason and to no good end, while some fleabitten carny of fate mocks our
efforts, and it’s nice to play ”let’s pretend”, but who really wants to
sign on for that ride?
Gawd, I need some sleep.
Originally published in ANTIQUE CHILDREN. Copyright 2011 C.F. Roberts, 2015 Molotov Editions
Showing posts with label Gonzo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gonzo. Show all posts
Saturday, October 17, 2015
Tuesday, October 6, 2015
ALL THE HACK WRITERS AND DEAN KOONTZ TOO
I wrote this, probably somewhere in
the ballpark of the mid-to-late 90s for the Unbearables' compilation,
THE WORST BOOK I EVER READ, and forgot about it sometime thereafter.
The book, amazingly enough, popped up in 2009, long after I'd
forgotten about it, but better late than never, and as I've said
before, I always love being involved in anything the Unbearables do.
The book is a fun and brain-crunching pile of deconstruction and my
part of it is pretty much a puff piece by comparison. Check it
out---it'll definitely give you a new way of looking at literature.
At the time I wrote this
little pro-pulp/anti-Koontz jam I had read two or three of his books
(I'm thinking one was called STRANGERS and one was called WHISPERS
but I might be wrong on those titles)...'round about the early-to-mid
2000s (?) I went through this weird spate of listening to books on
tape and among the books I “read” this way were the first two Odd
Thomas novels. I decided that everything I disliked about Koontz as a
writer back in the early days....I still disliked. So the Goof
stands. Mr. Koontz probably wouldn't appreciate it, but what the
hell? He can go cry on his bed of money. Wiseass attitude intact,
here it is...
Not long ago, a friend and I were
talking about books. He lamented the passing of the Era of the Hack.
Those were the good old, bad old
days. They're gone----they were on their way out the door when I was
a kid, in fact. You can still find their cobwebbed revenant in flea
markets and used bookstores---even there, you'll see them slowly
usurped by a fancier, slicker, more surefooted brand of garbage.
The best authors of my
generation, and I can think of at least four I know personally, are
probably doomed to die unpublished and unread. It's a painful reality
to look at.
A few of these aforementioned
writers were weaned on cheap, dime store trash literature. It shows
in their writing---they deliver texts of gut-level simplicity, which,
like the best works of the old hacks, betray sly and subtle depths.
There is much to be gleaned from lowly bargain bin scribes.
Hack Writing---Christ Jesus. Gone
are the days when a browser might score a cheap edition of Howard's
Conan novels or a thirty-five cent Signet edition of an Ian
Fleming James Bond thriller in all its violent, misogynistic glory.
Gone are Edgar Rice Burroughs and Doc Savage the Man of Bronze. Gone
is Zorro, fighting for freedom in a California that never existed.
Gone is the day when a Jim Thompson could ply his sublime and bloody
trade.
Gone, also, are the
surprises---where H.P. Lovecraft could churn out such artful and
mythic horror pulp that a generation of mystical dabblers would
actually mistake it for occult fact; Where a Chester Himes could
infuse raw, gritty detective stories with canyons of racial tension
and urban rage. You'd be hard-pressed to find another Philip K. Dick,
whose readable science fiction opened up into allegory, subversion
and a new form of Gnosticism.
The writing hasn't necessarily
elevated---in many cases it's regressed. But the prices of the books
have gone sky high and the cover art is spellbinding in its
obviousness. It's all about the package.
Dean Koontz is nobody's candidate
for genius. His ham-fisted technique is pounded into a succession of
thrillers that are perennial best sellers. He's not one to be stymied
by hobgoblins like craftsmanship or finesse.
Big deal, anyway; He's laughing
all the way to the bank.
The infotainment complex does not
hedge bets on long shots or X-factors. Dean Koontz is the epitome of
a safe bet. In the pantheon of modern horror he lacks the sense of
history that a Peter Straub or a Ramsey Campbell might possess. He
lacks the basic human decency of the Splatterpunk Crowd. He's even
devoid of the sense of dramatic irony you might find reading some of
Stephen King's better stuff. Not that it matters, of course—Koontz
wouldn't know craft if he fell over it, but he does quite well
without it.
My writerly mentors in college
were all Hemingway Groupies. Whether you give a rat's puckered ass
about Hemingway or not—whether you, as a writer (if you ARE a
writer) choose to follow his lead, I reckon the Hemingway Model is a
sound one. Scale it back to the bone. Take the terse, minimalist,
journalistic road. Show, don't tell. I don't write like Hemingway,
but I still think his style provides a useful foundation. Now and
again I like to revisit the terrain, just as an experiment, just to
make sure I'm still capable.
Koontz is no technician. If
you're handing out marks using Hemingway as a guide, he's still in
grade school. He's given to heavy-handed summarization, even in the
realm of character development. When the time comes to show, not
tell, just watch Koontz in action---he tells and tells and tells.
Like it matters. His books are
fertile ground for bad movie adaptations and the cash register keeps
on ringing.
Art, a truly useless term, is
also a dead thing in the world of infotainment, and can easily be
excised neatly from the product.
Is Koontz the bastard buttchild
of Alistair MacLean and Jim Thompson? Does he carry the banner of the
new pulp? Well...no.
The dime store hacks are, as
previously mentioned, obsolete---Neanderthals dead and buried in the
vast corporate tundra. Koontz and his ilk are the new model Cro
Magnons---well-packaged, reasonably inoffensive sure bets who will
twang your receptors, suck you in, spit you out and give you the sort
of carnival ride you relish every time. It's a mediocre ride, but
your stomach will churn as you plunge down the last hill and you'll
laugh and pay to get on again. Koontz and his corporate pimps will
cash your check and salute their take with a six pack of Coors (Beer
of FascistsTM).
And you'll love it. Every
second. Hell---even I read the bastard's books.
Copyright 2009 Autonomedia/ 2015
Molotov Editions
**************
The wonderful folks at CORVUS REVIEW
have just released their Fall issue, which includes my short story,
“Boil Order”. Check 'em out here:
THIS WEEK'S PLAYLIST:
- KING CRIMSON-Lark's Tongues in Aspic
- KING CRIMSON-Discipline
- THESE IMMORTAL SOULS-Marry Me Maxi-Single
- BLACK SABBATH-Master of Reality
- MINUTEMEN-Paranoid Time EP
- LEFT OF THE DIAL Box Set
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)